On Thu, Sep 06, 2012 at 08:50:03AM -0700, Kevin Cosgrove wrote: > > On 6 September 2012 at 7:41, "Len Ovens" <len@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > > > On Thu, September 6, 2012 2:07 am, Jeremy Jongepier wrote: > > > On 09/06/12 07:28, Len Ovens wrote: > > >> Be aware that putting: snd-ice1712 snd > > >> will put all that other stuff on irq 16 between your ice and your > > >> internal > > >> card and you may wish to explicitly make them lower. > > > > > > I thought that rtirq looks at softirqs and not at hardware IRQs. So if > > > the order in rtirq is snd_ice1712 snd then only snd_ice1712 gets a > > > higher prio and all the other devices on the hardware IRQ get the > > > default prio (which is 50). The next item in the list (snd) gets a prio > > > below snd_ice1712 of which the step is defined by RTIRQ_PRIO_DECR > > > (default is 5). If there are multiple snd devices they get a prio below > > > the first snd device with steps of 1. > > > Maybe this behavior has changed with the most recent version of rtirq, > > > haven't tried it. > > > > I'm on the wrong machine just now, but I found when I specify usb3 and > > then usb strange things happen. My comment was check what the changes to > > the script do, it is not always what is expected. On this machine it is > > pretty good. my config line is firewire snd usb3 usb i8042 > > I'm not sure why I left it this way actually as I do not use FW... I think > > I have the port turned off in bios. Anyway, the usb ports are priority 75 > > and 74 and i8042 are 70 and 69... not 5 apart. On the netbook it is even > > stranger. > > What file is it where you're setting this priority order? Under Debian, it is /etc/default/rtirq, not sure about Fedora. Cheers, S.M. _______________________________________________ Linux-audio-user mailing list Linux-audio-user@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.linuxaudio.org/listinfo/linux-audio-user
