> People have managed it in the past with varying degrees of success. The > standard method these days is to use pulseaudio's jack-sink over dbus.
FWIW, I had epic fails with dbus in Ubuntu 12.04.
> > I don't know why people still insist on making their lives more difficult > that necessary. Pulse works just fine as a jack client.
> because pulse is a dog, and its latency blows?
Different configurations are right for different use cases. I run pulse through jack for daily use, but I wouldn't do that in a concert. For instance, I might want to have Skype open in a normal session, and that seems to play best with pulseaudio. But I wouldn't use it in a performance, in which case it's simple to start the jack server but not pulse.
hjh
_______________________________________________ Linux-audio-user mailing list Linux-audio-user@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.linuxaudio.org/listinfo/linux-audio-user
