On 27 August 2012 21:46, Grant <emailgrant@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: >> Isn't there something about FPU and the SheevaPlug not having one? I vaguely >> recall a thread about this. Maybe not in this list but jack-devel. > > Thanks, I will look into that. Are there any other requirements I > should be aware of? does the sheeva host hard drives via USB? if it's USB 2.0, you might want to think what they can handle, that connection won't match SATA in your desktop/laptop. having said that, it's still faster than the 100Mbit ethernet (if that's what your connection speed will be) between the two computers > Would 1G ethernet provide much lower latency compared to 100M? hmm, interesting question. i would guess not, latency and bandwdith are different concepts, the latter shouldn't affect the former latency is a function of the quality of the network interfaces, the length of the wires/distance between wireless receiver, the number of links and possibly buffer size. maybe some other things will affect it, but i would guess these would be key i found this quite useful for explaining the difference between the two: http://compnetworking.about.com/od/speedtests/a/network-speed.htm from that it appears that latency can affect actual bandwidth though, in certain conditions -- robin http://fu.ac.nz - Auckland's Free University _______________________________________________ Linux-audio-user mailing list Linux-audio-user@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.linuxaudio.org/listinfo/linux-audio-user
