On Tue, 21 Aug 2012 19:44:35 +0200, Kaj Ailomaa <zequence@xxxxxxxxxx>
wrote:
On Tue, 21 Aug 2012 19:27:59 +0200, Ralf Mardorf
<ralf.mardorf@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
On Tue, 2012-08-21 at 19:21 +0200, Kaj Ailomaa wrote:
On Tue, 21 Aug 2012 15:06:22 +0200, James Harkins
<jamshark70@xxxxxxxxx>
wrote:
>> From: "Kaj Ailomaa"
>> To make linux-lowlatency default, I'd just not install
linux-generic at
>> all.
>
> Maybe overkill: grub-customizer lets you choose whichever installed
> kernel you want to be the default.
>
Not overkill, since -lowlatency is a -generic, but with a different
configuration. Why keep -generic, if you don't need it for anything?
Or else
- you simply edit grub.cfg manually, as I did
- you switch to grub legacy, as I did and edit menu.lst manually as I do
:p
Why making things unneeded complicated?
Regards,
Ralf
I was just pointing out why deciding boot order between kernels may be
unneeded, if keeping -generic and -lowlatency on the same machine, as
they are more or less the same kernel.
Don't see how editing files manually, and installing legacy software
That should have read, "less complicated"
makes things complicated compared to doing nothing at all.
_______________________________________________
Linux-audio-user mailing list
Linux-audio-user@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.linuxaudio.org/listinfo/linux-audio-user
_______________________________________________
Linux-audio-user mailing list
Linux-audio-user@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.linuxaudio.org/listinfo/linux-audio-user
