On Sat, 11 Aug 2012 08:11:01 +0200 (CEST) Julien Claassen <julien@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > Hello David1 > I agree, but to be honest I take slight offense as well, sincethat might as > well have been me. If you pardon my Klatchian: For fuck's sake: Massy is blind > as well and will > most cdertainly not have seen that. I don't know, on whichsystem he built. I > can only remember, thatIhad enough problems, when I first started my website. > Kind regards > Julien > > 050e010d0f12010401-0405-0d09-030f12011a0f0d- > Such Is Life: Very Intensely Adorable; > Free And Jubilating Amazement Revels, Dancing On - FLOWERS! A good point, and something I've fallen foul of myself in the past. It is very easy for those of us with reasonably good sight to forget there are a large number of people less fortunate. It also works two ways. An extremely large number of websites out there are virtually un-navigable to the blind. As a double check, when making alterations to my own (rather simple site) I double check with styles turned off. This can be very revealing! -- Will J Godfrey http://www.musically.me.uk Say you have a poem and I have a tune. Exchange them and we can both have a poem, a tune, and a song. _______________________________________________ Linux-audio-user mailing list Linux-audio-user@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.linuxaudio.org/listinfo/linux-audio-user
