On 08/07/2012 10:39 PM, Ken Restivo wrote: > On Tue, Aug 07, 2012 at 10:12:02PM +0200, Robin Gareus wrote: >> On 08/07/2012 10:07 PM, Ken Restivo wrote: >>> Is there a working/stable debian package for Squeeze or equivalent with a 3.4 kernel or something 3.x? >> >> http://packages.debian.org/squeeze-backports/linux-image-rt-amd64 > > Hmm. Added to /etc/apt/sources.list: > > deb http://backports.debian.org/debian-backports squeeze-backports main > > Then: > > $ sudo apt-get update > > ... > > > $ sudo apt-get install linux-image-3.2.0-0.bpo.2-rt-amd64 > Reading package lists... Done > Building dependency tree > Reading state information... Done > Some packages could not be installed. This may mean that you have > requested an impossible situation or if you are using the unstable > distribution that some required packages have not yet been created > or been moved out of Incoming. > The following information may help to resolve the situation: > > The following packages have unmet dependencies: > linux-image-3.2.0-0.bpo.2-rt-amd64 : Depends: linux-base (>= 3~) but 2.6.32-45 is to be installed > Recommends: firmware-linux-free (>= 3~) but 2.6.32-45 is to be installed > Breaks: initramfs-tools (< 0.99~) but 0.98.8 is to be installed > E: Broken packages > huh? well maybe `apt-get -t squeeze linux-rt-amd64` will do the trick. Or simply use `aptitude` and its dependency resolver. Maybe a bug in debian's backports ?! I don't know. >> http://packages.debian.org/sid/linux-image-rt-amd64 >> >> backports is at 3.2 - there's a 3.4.X version is in experimental, too. >> >> http://packages.debian.org/experimental/linux-image-3.4-trunk-rt-amd64 > > > Interesting, well I've already exceeded my time budget for "while I've got this thing on, I wonder if there's a 64-bit kernel for it". > > Thanks though! > > -ken _______________________________________________ Linux-audio-user mailing list Linux-audio-user@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.linuxaudio.org/listinfo/linux-audio-user
