I agree with your review. The library is such a great effort for the Open Source community but yeah, especially the sustain of some of the instruments (or lack thereof) has been a problem for me as well... On Mon, Aug 6, 2012 at 2:21 AM, Brett McCoy <idragosani@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On Sun, Aug 5, 2012 at 7:59 PM, Nils <list@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > >> Full version: http://www.nilsgey.de/2012/08/06/ExperimentOne-ForSonatinaSymphonicOrchestra-2/ >> >> tl;dr: >> Wrote a piece, 1:30 length, to test the Sonatine Symphonic Orchestra. >> The lib is mediocre and outdated but still the best open source one. >> >> Youtube: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=eJcraiTevSs&feature=player_embedded >> Flac: http://www.nilsgey.de/uploads/Experiment%20One%20-%20For%20Sonatina%20Symphonic%20Orchestra.flac >> >> This was also a toolchain test: >> Laborejo -> jack-smf-player -> Lisao+linuxsampler -> jack_capture. >> No audio mixing (EQ, compressor etc.) involved but ir lv2 on the linuxsampler sum. > > Those instruments don't sound bad at all, although it seems this > library has some limitations with chromatic notes and velocity layers. > > -- > Brett W. McCoy -- http://www.brettwmccoy.com > ------------------------------------------------------------------------ > "In the rhythm of music a secret is hidden; If I were to divulge it, > it would overturn the world." > -- Jelaleddin Rumi > _______________________________________________ > Linux-audio-user mailing list > Linux-audio-user@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > http://lists.linuxaudio.org/listinfo/linux-audio-user _______________________________________________ Linux-audio-user mailing list Linux-audio-user@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.linuxaudio.org/listinfo/linux-audio-user
