On Wednesday 18 July 2012 16:03:54 Folderol wrote: > On Wed, 18 Jul 2012 11:27:37 -0700 > > Kris Calabio <kriscalabio@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > Sorry, to bump an old thread, but I want more feedback about this. With > > a cc-by-sa, what are the pros and cons of other people selling my music > > without requiring my permission? > > In theory the SA (share alike) should stop them, as if you've given it > free, they would have to do the same. In my humble view, this is an incorrect take on what share alike means in the license. Basically, it means you have to share under the same license, not at the same price. You do have to ask the question as to why someone would buy from a third party versus get the music at no cost from the original writer / artist? If someone does manage to make some decent money from that game, you could just look at them as self hired, self funding promoters for you and your music. There is no current SA license alone and the BY bit of the BY-SA being discussed refers to attribution. > How precise the wording is and strong > the protection is, I don't know. I guess someone could do a re-recording / re-mix of your music and being the "artist" instead of you, they could be the one with the emotional connection to the fan and thus the one the fan would be more likely to buy from. However, the BY-SA would require they use BY-SA on their recording and while they could try and sell copies of their recording of your music, you could use the license to legally give copies away and undercut them. all the best, drew _______________________________________________ Linux-audio-user mailing list Linux-audio-user@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.linuxaudio.org/listinfo/linux-audio-user
