Re: OT: releasing music under Creative Commons

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 18.07.2012 22:03, Folderol wrote:
> On Wed, 18 Jul 2012 11:27:37 -0700
> Kris Calabio <kriscalabio@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>> Sorry, to bump an old thread, but I want more feedback about this.  
>> With a
>> cc-by-sa, what are the pros and cons of other people selling my music
>> without requiring my permission?

Pro
-exposure for free
-links to your page
-SA stops them to use it where big money is involved. (They'd buy a
license from you instead of putting latest hollywood movies under sa)
-easier to manage for small broadcasters of all kinds.

Con
-Other people can distribute physical devices of your work and earn
money. You better offer these yourself, too. If you can't afford
pressing a cd, that would blockbust the music world... maybe someone
else is going to do it for you.



> 
> In theory the SA (share alike) should stop them, as if you've given it free,
> they would have to do the same.
SA means derived works are given away under the same license, not same
conditions. You may sell them.

>How precise the wording is and strong the
> protection is, I don't know.
> 
read it here:
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/legalcode

quoting 4b)
"You may Distribute or Publicly Perform an Adaptation only under the
terms of: (i) this License; (ii) a later version of this License with
the same License Elements as this License; (iii) a Creative Commons
jurisdiction license (either this or a later license version) that
contains the same License Elements as this License"

/mn0
_______________________________________________
Linux-audio-user mailing list
Linux-audio-user@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.linuxaudio.org/listinfo/linux-audio-user


[Index of Archives]     [Linux Sound]     [ALSA Users]     [Pulse Audio]     [ALSA Devel]     [Sox Users]     [Linux Media]     [Kernel]     [Photo Sharing]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Media]

  Powered by Linux