On Sun, 2012-07-08 at 13:18 +0200, Ralf Mardorf wrote: > > > > thanks for speaking on behalf of all of us ralf. or perhaps on the > > > > other hand, we're grown up enough to decide for ourselves? > > Accidentally I found a book some minutes ago, again pardon for another > mail, ... > > > > > > > > ... it's "BEATLES Complete Guitar Edition". Too funny, I started > learning guitar using the same book's piano edition, I couldn't find it, > but I own it and IIRC the piano edition even for guitarists is much > better. Not only that the guitar version is missing more than the piano > version (same songs, but a completely different niveau), both are also > transposed different to the original songs. > > "Yellow Submarine" is missing every "unneeded" chord for the guitar > edition, but IIRC all chords are written in the piano edition and for a > childish, lovely song like this, comping > [ http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Comping ] is a must. > > OTOH, the original "Real Book" is amazing, but IMO the idea of such > books is to remember the texts and the "musical tendency". Names for > chords are very helpful, I like them, but they're just a link to how to > play a song, as notes and tabs are too, they don't say detailed how to > play a song. > > I guess it was the OP who wrote the python script naming a combination > of notes by different CORRECT names (since the notes only don't provide > this information). > > In the end a command line tool still will be airy-fairy. Oops, perhaps "Cry Baby Cry" does fit better to "chord playing" in different ways. I suspect that "comping" isn't the academical correct term, hopefully you understand my doubts anyway. _______________________________________________ Linux-audio-user mailing list Linux-audio-user@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.linuxaudio.org/listinfo/linux-audio-user
