Does anyone knows if there is a reason, except for the concern of a unique name per client, for jack clients to use the PID as suffix for the client name instead of simply allows the user to name it through the command line?
As mentioned in [1], if we use, per example, qjackctl as front end for jackd and save the session, the next day you cannot load the same connections because the PIDs had changed. I think it would be better if we could name the clients ourselves.
[1] http://lists.linuxaudio.org/pipermail/linux-audio-dev/2009-December/026175.html
The email referenced in [1] was not solved, so I don't know if we do have an answer for that question by now.
Cheers,
--
Marcel Bonnet
_______________________________________________ Linux-audio-user mailing list Linux-audio-user@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.linuxaudio.org/listinfo/linux-audio-user
