Re: SFZ vs. GIG

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 27 May 2012 19:04, Nils <list@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
On Sun, 27 May 2012 18:33:35 +0200
"Victor A. Stoichita" <vicsto@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> Hi everybody,
>
> I'm planing to make a gamelan soundfont to use with linuxsampler. Nothing
> really complicated: 1 sample per key, no sustain loops, some keys use 2
> velocity layers.
> I hesitate between GIG and SFZ format. Do they have different
> possibilities, or are they just two ways to do the same things?
> Also, what would be the workflow to create an SFZ file on linux?
>
> Cheers to all,
> Victor


Use SFZ. It is an open format, text based.
Also sfz is more modern and has more options.

Workflow, I don't know if there are sfz editors. But writing one should be much much easier than handling the gig format.
You should ask RytmenPinne who did the Salamander Piano and the Salamander Drums, both in sfz format.
If anything fails you can still write it by hand with a texteditor.

Nils

Hi,

Thanks for the advice, and for the SFZ reference sheet! 
I had seen sfzed, but I would not install wine just to use it. So I'm up for building the soundfont in plain text. What's the quickest way to have linuxsampler reload the file in order to hear the changes?

Victor
_______________________________________________
Linux-audio-user mailing list
Linux-audio-user@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.linuxaudio.org/listinfo/linux-audio-user

[Index of Archives]     [Linux Sound]     [ALSA Users]     [Pulse Audio]     [ALSA Devel]     [Sox Users]     [Linux Media]     [Kernel]     [Photo Sharing]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Media]

  Powered by Linux