On Tue, 2012-05-22 at 09:43 -1000, david wrote: > > As I mentioned above, unless they have made sudden huge leaps in quality > > of their noise reduction process it isn't really a good quality tool. I > > know from conversations with Ricardus some of his uses and they are > > similar to what I have done in the past as well, for example restoring > > old analog recordings, etc. Where depending on the source material you > > have to have a pretty dang minimal artifact experience(Recordings of > > high dynamic range classical music for example), and also depending on > > the source material the exact needs may change over time, requiring > > automation to use effectively. Neither of these applied in my > > experience with Audacity's tool. > > High dynamic range classical music was exactly what a friend of mine was > working with. First step was extremely-well-cleaned vinyl. He recorded > them from a high-end turntable through an Audiophile 2496. Then cleaned > in gnome wave cleaner. I've heard the digitized versions, and there is > no noise in them ... I have HEARD examples of Gnome Wave Cleaner doing some good work, but I have never been able to get it to yield results like the demos I have heard. It also crashes on large files for me. It wouldn't even load the 45 minute live-music sets that I attempted to use it on. Rich.. _______________________________________________ Linux-audio-user mailing list Linux-audio-user@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.linuxaudio.org/listinfo/linux-audio-user
