Re: rtirq - what does it improve, and how can I measure it?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 05/08/2012 03:56 PM, Ralf Mardorf wrote:
> Hi Robin :)
> 
> On Tue, 2012-05-08 at 15:11 +0200, Robin Gareus wrote:
>> What is "kernel-rt ex 3.0" ??
> 
> "ex" (in German "ab") is for ">=", sorry if I'm wrong with this
> translation ;).

right, until you start thinking about your *ex*-girlfriend :)

I think "ex" means ">" not ">=". (in German /ex/: "von" - not "ab").

>> If you compile a recent kernel (>=3.0) with the PREEMPT_RT patch and set
>> "CONFIG_IRQ_FORCED_THREADING=y", the boot-option 'threadirqs' is implied
>> and using it makes no difference.
> 
> So patch-3.0.23-rt40 already includes it? I don't need to patch the
> patch?

I don't know, but I expect so. UTSL. patch-3.0.30-rt50 does include it.

Cheers!
robin
_______________________________________________
Linux-audio-user mailing list
Linux-audio-user@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.linuxaudio.org/listinfo/linux-audio-user


[Index of Archives]     [Linux Sound]     [ALSA Users]     [Pulse Audio]     [ALSA Devel]     [Sox Users]     [Linux Media]     [Kernel]     [Photo Sharing]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Media]

  Powered by Linux