On 05/01/2012 04:17 AM, Jeremy Jongepier wrote:
On 05/01/12 12:09, Ralf Mardorf wrote:
Jeremy, the bad is, that I don't have another PCIe x1 slot:(.
Ah bummer :(
> In my experience, restarting the script tries to raise the priorities
> of the threads in RTIRQ_NAME_LIST, but the ones which are already
> raised aren't lowered even if you leave them out of the list.
>
> Try rebooting the computer.
>
> Cheers, Pablo
*reboot*
The reboot doesn't improve anything:(.
So the output of /etc/init.d/rtirq status is the same as in the other
mail? That's really weird. The only thing I can think of is that
something else (another script?) is prioritizing stuff too (like the
nvidia and ohci_hcd processes).
(I don't seem to find the start of the thread in my mailbox)
ohci_hcd is there is you specify usb in the list of priorities rtirq
needs to raise. And nvidia is there probably because it shares an
interrupt with a real soundcard. Rtirq does not raise the priority of
only the soundcard, but everything that uses the interrupt that the
soundcard uses.
AFAIK it is not possible (or simple) to raise _just_ the soundcard as it
is impossible to know which irq process corresponds to a soundcard (and
which one does not). That is because the labeling of the irq process
names in the ps listing is arbitrary. At least that is what I remember
seeing last I looked at this issue. You can of course manually lower the
priorities of non-soundcard irq processes with chrt.
-- Fernando
The steps between the priorities
strengthens my suspicion, it should be 5 but some processes do not get a
prio that can be divided by 5 (like nvidia which has prio 82). No one on
the Ubuntu Studio list encountered the same issue? Maybe Ubuntu (or
Ubuntu Studio) prioritizes processes somewhere else.
_______________________________________________
Linux-audio-user mailing list
Linux-audio-user@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.linuxaudio.org/listinfo/linux-audio-user
