On 04/05/2012 10:27 PM, Josh Lawrence wrote:
I've been playing with the non session manager, and like it very much
Yes, I like it also. It's fast and it seems to do what you expect from a session manager to do. Tbh, I like it more then JackSession at the moment, because the extra functionality it gives you and the pleasant workflow. Also I think it's a good decision to not make it dependent on JACK. Now you can add apps without JACK support (Frescobaldi, Emacs with supercollider?) to a session and leave others (with JACK support) out of the session if you want that. It also doesn't have extra dependencies for the apps with NSM support, which is a nice plus if you think about adoption of the API. An obvious advantage compared to Ladish is that you don't need Jackdbus or something, just plain JACK.
I also used aj-snapshot for script sessions, but JACKPatch, which comes with non-session-manager (NSM), is a good replacement for that.
I changed my JackSession and script sessions to NSM here. So far so good! Regards, \r _______________________________________________ Linux-audio-user mailing list Linux-audio-user@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.linuxaudio.org/listinfo/linux-audio-user
