Re: recording IR's ?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Thursday 22 March 2012 14:53:36 alexander wrote:
> Simple question, When recording IR's with a transient (popping balloon)
> Do I need to run it through some post processing like you have to with a
> sweep? or do you just cut the beginning and use it as is?

Use as is. It is already the response to an almost perfect delta-peak.

If you really know the popping sound of your ballon, you could deconvolve that 
to get the response to a real delta-peak.
But when you record two signals, one far away and one near the 
ballon/gun/wood-blocks and then use the nearer signal for deconvolution, you 
will probably also eliminate the early-reflections. Of course if its only the 
long tail you are after...

Another note: When you do not cut the inital peak, you won't have to decide on 
the level of the IR compared to the dry signal. Because then your IR'ed signal 
is original (as it sounds through a popping balloon) and reflections.

Have fun,

Arnold

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.

_______________________________________________
Linux-audio-user mailing list
Linux-audio-user@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.linuxaudio.org/listinfo/linux-audio-user

[Index of Archives]     [Linux Sound]     [ALSA Users]     [Pulse Audio]     [ALSA Devel]     [Sox Users]     [Linux Media]     [Kernel]     [Photo Sharing]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Media]

  Powered by Linux