On Sat, 14 Jan 2012 13:04:42 +0100 Renato <rennabh@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On Fri, 13 Jan 2012 19:42:23 +0100 (CET) > Julien Claassen <julien@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > >You could have something like: ecasound -a:1 -i > > playat,start[1],infile.wav -ea:gain[1] -a:2 -i \ > > playat,start[2],infile.wav -ea:gain[2] ... \ -a:all -o outfile.wav > > -ea is in percent 0 = silence, 100 = normal level. You can decide > > between mixmode avg (devide volme by number of existing inputs or > > sum, just leave everything to the user. > > After each -ea (or before) you can insert something likeL: > > -eli:1767,6,3.2,2.3,0.5,0.12,0.33 > > Meaning use LADSPA effect with unique ID 1767 (CAPS chorus) and > > the mentioned parameters. Use analyseplugin or look at the parameter > > list of the plugin in some other graphical LADSPA host. > > I think I now grasp the coolness of ecasound, it does seem more neat > than what I was using. I hope to soon have an updated version of the > script using ecasound. > > > cheers, > renato So I have updated it to use ecasound and put it on github. You can get it with: git clone git://github.com/nareto/choir-sample.git It sounds not as good as the first version to my ears though... like if there was some clipping - but there shouldn't be, since I used -z:mixdown,avg right? Or maybe the timing and gains are different (I changed from uniform to gaussian distribution)... will do some more experiments. best wishes, renato _______________________________________________ Linux-audio-user mailing list Linux-audio-user@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.linuxaudio.org/listinfo/linux-audio-user