On Tue, Oct 25, 2011 at 2:14 PM, Egor Sanin <egor.sanin@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On 10/25/11, Alexandre Prokoudine <alexandre.prokoudine@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: >> On Fri, Oct 21, 2011 at 7:25 PM, Charles Henry <czhenry@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: >> >>> In your opinion, what kind of tools should we use to organize such a >>> project? like websites, wiki, mailing list, repository, etc... ? >> >> I'm not Egor :), but you could just use Google Code and a Google >> group. > My apologies for not responding earlier! > > I personally am very much against Google for this sort of thing. I > feel that in the event their tools are used for organization, the > ignorant mass will automatically assume that Google is doing linux a > favour and somehow contributing to this project. A main item we want to have is support for binary files--I think this is handled well with git, right? The code itself (VHDL or Verilog) is hardware independent, but a compiled file is specific for a particular FPGA device. Users won't ever want to have to build from source--just flash binaries. Chuck _______________________________________________ Linux-audio-user mailing list Linux-audio-user@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.linuxaudio.org/listinfo/linux-audio-user
