On 23 October 2011 at 12:15, david <gnome@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > I used to use watermarking on some of my photos. There's really no way > to watermark a photo in a way that can't be essentially negated via > graphic manipulations. > > I think that if the software needed to verify the watermark is open > source, anyone will know how to identify the elements of the file that > comprise the watermark. Then they'll also know how to remove them. Maybe I'll just have to hope most people are honest, and ignore the rest. Of course, that honest people thing didn't work out so well for a while with music downloading via Napster. I wonder if the iTunes & Amazon small fee for download is working any better for the music writers, most of whom seem to tour for their livelihood now. Anyway, I can still see a useful side to a watermarking program. TTFN.... -- Kevin _______________________________________________ Linux-audio-user mailing list Linux-audio-user@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.linuxaudio.org/listinfo/linux-audio-user
