On Thu, Oct 6, 2011 at 11:29 AM, Hartmut Noack <zettberlin@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > Am 06.10.2011 16:27, schrieb Rui Nuno Capela: >> On Thu, 6 Oct 2011 14:46:29 +0400, Louigi Verona >> <louigi.verona@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: >>> Hey Rui! >>> Thanks a lot for implementing the clip thing - I remember asking for >>> that myself a long time ago ) >> >> question is, does it work now as you asked/wanted back then? > > As far as I am concerned I see it as a remarkable improvement. It brings > some of the virtues of a loop-oriented sequencer I sometimes missed in > Qtractor. > > To detach a clip from its siblings by giving it a new name makes perfect > sense to me still.... it would be nice to have some automatism that simply > iterates the filename. Some people feel a disturbance in the force, if they > have to switch from editing notes in a pianoroll to typing filenames ;-) Yes yes yes. This is the worst "feature" of QTractor. I don't give a $%^& what the filename of an individual clip is, and I don't want to be interrupted to think about where on disk the file should be stored. Stash it in a per-session directory, or a "clip library" or whatever. Don't make me think about that mess I call my home directory. DISCLAIMER: I haven't used qtractor in a while; I assume it still works this way. If not, someone tell me to shut up. _______________________________________________ Linux-audio-user mailing list Linux-audio-user@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.linuxaudio.org/listinfo/linux-audio-user
