Peter, I very much enjoyed your music. Jeremiah Sent from my Samsung smartphone on AT&T Peter Crighton <petecrighton@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: >Finally I am getting around to answering here… > >Thanks for all your answers and interest in my blog! >It's a pity that it is not readable without JavaScript, but as >Blogger's new Dynamic Views (which apparently rely heavily on >JavaScript) were one big motivation for me starting this blog, I will >not change it for the time being. > >Jeremy, thanks for your link. I didn't know it beforehand. > >Kevin, I do make a lot of music myself, including prog. I play mainly >bass and guitar and sing. You can find more info about that on >http://www.petercrighton.de/en – direct link to some recordings: >http://music.petercrighton.de > > >Peter > >2011/10/4 Aaron L. <elmastero74@xxxxxxxxx>: >> Just went through Peter's tutorial. >> >> Great stuff. Took me a couple of tries to get it right (NOTE: you have to >> have the wave files in the same dir as the xml file)........even though your >> website explained that very plainly. >> >> Anyway, thanks for this. >> >> -Aaron >> >> >> >> On Mon, Oct 3, 2011 at 11:30 AM, Hartmut Noack <zettberlin@xxxxxxxxxxx> >> wrote: >>> >>> Am 01.10.2011 11:04, schrieb Tony Austin: >>>> >>>> Is JavaScript so bad? Why turn it off? >>> >>> Java Script is great, it is, in itself, not bad at all but a useful method >>> to make a better website. >>> >>> BUT: as it is powerful, it is abused on a regular basis. So to turn it off >>> on any new site never being visited before is indeed a good idea. >>> >>> So for any website-distributor I recommend the following steps to make a >>> site rock in the users client: >>> >>> 1.) present your site in HTML5+CSS3 as cool as possible >>> 2.) provide extra-benefit using UNOBSTRUSIVE JS >>> 3.) Tell the users explicitly that there is more and better content if JS >>> ist turned on. >>> >>> Your page fails at least to meet 1.) and 3.) >>> >>> Try to find a way to tell visitors at least, that they need to allow JS on >>> the site. But this is second best: present plain HTML5+CSS and tell the >>> users that JS can give more is better... >>> >>> >>>> I am happy to have it on all the >>>> time and the worries are much less under Linux. It's not Java or ActiveX >>>> after all. >>>> >>>> On 1 October 2011 10:34, Arve Barsnes<arve.barsnes@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: >>>> >>>>> On 1 October 2011 08:53, Lorenzo Sutton<lsutton@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>> On 10/01/2011 04:14 AM, Ken Restivo wrote: >>>>>>> >>>>>>> On Sat, Oct 01, 2011 at 03:00:02AM +0200, Peter Crighton wrote: >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Hello list, >>>>>>>> I just wanted to let you know that I started a new blog about >>>>>>>> Recording on Linux: http://linux-recording.blogspot.com/ >>>>>>>> The first entry (well, not counting the introduction here) is about >>>>>>>> using the Analogue Drums Big Mono drumkit with Hydrogen. Let me know >>>>>>>> what you think about the blog, any constructive criticism is much >>>>>>>> appreciated! >>>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> *sigh*, Google, doesn't anyone use HTML anymore? >>>>>>> >>>>>>> This is what that website looks like with JavaScript turned off: >>>>>>> >>>>>>> http://storage.restivo.org/misc/blogger.jpg >>>>>>> >>>>>>> I'm sure it's a fantastic blog, but, I dunno what Google has done to >>>>>>> it. >>>>>> >>>>>> If truth be told it seems a problem with this particular blog (which by >>>>> >>>>> the >>>>>> >>>>>> way seems a very cool idea ;) - other blogspot blogs seem to work with >>>>>> JavaScript turned off. >>>>>> >>>>>> I'm not a blogger user so I'm not sure what google puts in when you >>>>> >>>>> create a >>>>>> >>>>>> blog and what it leaves to the user. Maybe, the massive use of >>>>>> JavaScript >>>>>> comes in for recently created ones? >>>>>> >>>>>> That said. Yes it seems that google is pushing more and more for the >>>>>> use >>>>> >>>>> of >>>>>> >>>>>> JavaScript see e.g. >>>>>> >>>>> >>>>> http://googlesystem.blogspot.com/2007/05/no-javascript-no-google-navigation.html >>>>>> >>>>> It seems that, without allowing javascript from blogblog.com this >>>>> particular blog doesn't work at all. Is that also owned by Google? >>>>> >>>>> Arve >>>>> _______________________________________________ >>>>> Linux-audio-user mailing list >>>>> Linux-audio-user@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >>>>> http://lists.linuxaudio.org/listinfo/linux-audio-user >>>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> _______________________________________________ >>>> Linux-audio-user mailing list >>>> Linux-audio-user@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >>>> http://lists.linuxaudio.org/listinfo/linux-audio-user >>> >>> _______________________________________________ >>> Linux-audio-user mailing list >>> Linux-audio-user@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >>> http://lists.linuxaudio.org/listinfo/linux-audio-user >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Linux-audio-user mailing list >> Linux-audio-user@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >> http://lists.linuxaudio.org/listinfo/linux-audio-user >> >> > > > >-- >Peter Crighton | (mainly) Progressive Rock musician based in >Mainz/Wiesbaden, Germany >http://www.petercrighton.de >_______________________________________________ >Linux-audio-user mailing list >Linux-audio-user@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >http://lists.linuxaudio.org/listinfo/linux-audio-user _______________________________________________ Linux-audio-user mailing list Linux-audio-user@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.linuxaudio.org/listinfo/linux-audio-user
