On 09/28/2011 02:30 PM, Ralf Mardorf wrote: > I'm using a mix of Squeezy aka stable aka 6.0 and Wheezy aka testing aka > 7.0 and self build stuff, such as Jack2, ALSA and the kernel. Most > packages are from testing. My system is very similar. there's rarely things that break, but aptitude does an amazing job. > It's stable, there are just some dependency > issues regarding do development packages, that are needed to compile > Ardour3 with videotimeline. There's no additional dependencies for the videotimeline branch. In the past you needed boost-regex but recent libardour also uses it. As for compiling icsd (the video-server): There's lots of dependencies, most notably ffmpeg, but all are in debian. Nevertheless I suggest to just use the statically linked binary. > And well, I'll keep the nv driver (guess > it's the only stuff from stable), even while using the proprietary at > the moment. I'm working on getting my mix consistent and I'm very near > to it, but still didn't compile Ardour3 with videotimeline. Anyway, it's > brave to use unstable aka Sid. I suspect that there will be no > advantages regarding to audio and video, but I might be wrong. Perhaps > you should think of using testing instead. Perhaps you already do this > parallel to using Sid ;). I've pinned priorities: wheezy/testing:700; sid/unstable:500, squeeze/stable:300 > OT: Robin, what's the state of videotimeline for Ardour3? works for me. We'll look into merging it upstream after the 3.0 release. > Do I need to > use an older version of Ardour3? Last time I tried, I had issues > compiling it and didn't follow your advice to compile it from, IIRC git > instead of svn. yes. git is your friend. http://rg42.org/wiki/a3vtl#source_build_instructions have fun, robin _______________________________________________ Linux-audio-user mailing list Linux-audio-user@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.linuxaudio.org/listinfo/linux-audio-user
