On Sun, Sep 25, 2011 at 03:45:31PM -0400, Paul Davis wrote: > hint: the patch to add a new port type to JACK will involve on the > same order of magnitude number of characters as have already been used > in this email thread. Indeed. But why should anyone submit a patch for an idea that has already been rejected, in particular if the rejection was motivated in a way that implicitly condones crappy programming instead of criticizing it ? What sort of excellence can you expect if things are decided in that way ? (1) Don't take this personally, but I've had enough of this sort of negative argumentation for some time. I do remember the LV2 discussions (2), the Jack session ones, and some others. And the result is that I go my own way, even if that leads to a loss of synergy and benefit for all. (1) Mediocrity. (2) The real gem in that case was a remark that representing the sample rate as a ratio would lead to inefficiency as it required a (1, one) division. Ciao, -- FA _______________________________________________ Linux-audio-user mailing list Linux-audio-user@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.linuxaudio.org/listinfo/linux-audio-user
