On Thu, Sep 22, 2011 at 09:38:51PM +0000, Fons Adriaensen wrote: > On Thu, Sep 22, 2011 at 11:42:05PM +0400, Artem Vakhitov wrote: > > On 22.09.2011 23:16, Fons Adriaensen wrote: > >> If you need not only the timing but also to control volume > >> then it's unlikely this can be done without delay. The part > >> of the input that would contain usable information to control > >> volume would very probably come after the trigger, but to > >> play the sample you need both. The only solution then is to > >> delay the trigger. That means that simple solutions such as > >> the ladspa plugin can't do what you want. > > > > The thing is, I do not need to do that in any kind of real time. It > > would be sufficient to feed a "beat box" .wav file at the input and get > > the corresponding .wav or .mid file at the output. All digital > > processing can be done fully off-line, so all timing and amplitude info > > is there in advance. > > Even if it hasn't to work in real time Pd is probably the > ideal tool to prototype such a system. The alternative Just idle curiosity, but why do you guys recommend PD over SC or csound? I had the idea they were more or less equally suited. Cheers, S.M. _______________________________________________ Linux-audio-user mailing list Linux-audio-user@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.linuxaudio.org/listinfo/linux-audio-user
