Re : lowest usable latency from a USB 1 device?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 






----- Mail original -----
> De : Paul Davis <paul@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> À : linux-audio-user <linux-audio-user@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Cc : 
> Envoyé le : Vendredi 16 Septembre 2011 19h33
> Objet :  lowest usable latency from a USB 1 device?
> 
> if you can run a USB 1 class compliant audio device on your linux
> system with lower latency than the current minimum so far posted to
> this thread, please post with the settings you use and the type of
> device. if your best performance has already been posted, no need to
> repeat it.
> 
> i'll get the ball rolling with 2048 frames. note that we are assuming
> 2 channels only, but duplex mode (simultaneous capture+playback).
> 
> thanks.
> _______________________________________________
> Linux-audio-user mailing list
> Linux-audio-user@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> http://lists.linuxaudio.org/listinfo/linux-audio-user
>

As some others here:

Edirol UA-25 with
nperiods 3, frame size 128, 2x2 (duplex) 48kHz
without any problems on a 2.6.33.6-1.rt26 kernel and some sporadic xruns on a 3.1.0-rc5
_______________________________________________
Linux-audio-user mailing list
Linux-audio-user@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.linuxaudio.org/listinfo/linux-audio-user



[Index of Archives]     [Linux Sound]     [ALSA Users]     [Pulse Audio]     [ALSA Devel]     [Sox Users]     [Linux Media]     [Kernel]     [Photo Sharing]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Media]

  Powered by Linux