Re: Alternative to audacity for simple non-jack recording?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Arve Barsnes wrote:
On 13 September 2011 10:46, david <gnome@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
as several people have noted, it would be much better to fiddle more
with arecord first.
Maybe. My UCA-202 records fine using Audacity. I couldn't get arecord to
record anything from it, but I wasn't really trying that hard. When I try to
record using JACK, JACK fails to start up, reporting something about an
impossible sample size.

My feeling based on the original poster's info is that his device is only
marginally supported by ALSA.

Indeed, it is probably the cheapest thing available. But contrary to
your experience, I still couldn't get audacity to work, but arecord
worked just fine. That's probably some mismatch on what kind of
quality audio audacity is expecting though, and the same is probably
true of your device.

Mine works with Audacity with no problems. I don't know if it works with arecord - didn't put the time into figuring out arecord's command line options to find it out. While JACK just barfs. Hard to figure, why JACK and ALSA work fine for output through it, but not input, while Audacity works fine for both input and output.

Anyway, this is a Lenny system, planning to upgrade it to a Sid system. That will bring in newer ALSA and JACK, so if it's an issue buried in ALSA or JACK, perhaps it will be fixed.

--
David
gnome@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
authenticity, honesty, community
_______________________________________________
Linux-audio-user mailing list
Linux-audio-user@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.linuxaudio.org/listinfo/linux-audio-user


[Index of Archives]     [Linux Sound]     [ALSA Users]     [Pulse Audio]     [ALSA Devel]     [Sox Users]     [Linux Media]     [Kernel]     [Photo Sharing]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Media]

  Powered by Linux