On Sat, Aug 13, 2011 at 2:56 PM, rosea grammostola <rosea.grammostola@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On 08/13/2011 08:54 PM, Paul Davis wrote: >> >> On Sat, Aug 13, 2011 at 2:46 PM, rosea grammostola >> <rosea.grammostola@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: >> >>> Makes me wondering, is this tool doing anything 'nasty' in the view of >>> JackSession developers, for either apps with or without state? >> >> its only useful for clients with no state. clients with state will not >> work correctly with it and are not intended to be used with it. > > Thanks. Could you explain a bit more e.g. why doesn't it work correctly with > clients with state and what's going wrong in practice? all it does is to record the command that it started, and when told to restart, it uses that same command again. so, if the command involved a client that really did have state, the client would not get to save its state or restore it. this is why you can use it, for example, to include a non-JACK application in a jack session. _______________________________________________ Linux-audio-user mailing list Linux-audio-user@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.linuxaudio.org/listinfo/linux-audio-user
