Re: [LAD] [ANN] WIP - Jass, a Jack Simple Sampler

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Fri, Aug 12, 2011 at 4:14 AM, Florian Paul Schmidt
<mista.tapas@xxxxxxx> wrote:
> On 08/12/2011 09:39 AM, Phil Hézaine wrote:
>> May be a consensus about the numbering of channels would be wise at
>> least for Jack applications.
>> Either Channel 0 = Channel 1
>>     or Channel 1 = Channel 1 (like in JACK Keyboard. I used it for testing)
>> But it's an old story and all musicians are used to use this gymnastics.
>> Thanks again for this promising free software.
>
> I'm a computer scientist, so of course I start counting at 0 :D There's no doubt about it.. If someone else does it differently they are dead wrong ;D And by implication this means that I'm right. Ah, feels good to be right..
>
> This is what Dijkstra has to say about it:
>
> http://www.cs.utexas.edu/users/EWD/transcriptions/EWD08xx/EWD831.html
>

Dijkstra Considered Harmful

My hardware MIDI controller doesn't have a channel 0, but it goes up to 16!

Admit it: you never start counting from 0 in real life, only when
dealing with computers.  Nobody cares what bits go out on the wire...
_______________________________________________
Linux-audio-user mailing list
Linux-audio-user@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.linuxaudio.org/listinfo/linux-audio-user



[Index of Archives]     [Linux Sound]     [ALSA Users]     [Pulse Audio]     [ALSA Devel]     [Sox Users]     [Linux Media]     [Kernel]     [Photo Sharing]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Media]

  Powered by Linux