On 07/22/2011 05:29 PM, Jörn Nettingsmeier wrote: > hi jeremy! > > > thanks for your quick reply! > > On 07/22/2011 01:57 PM, Jeremy Jongepier wrote: > >> Would two separate devices work out too? Like a M-Audio MidAir with a >> Behringer BCF2000? The MidAir should work ootb afaict. > > very interesting product, thanks for the hint! > but without a similarly battery-powered control surface, the main > advantage is lost - if i have to deal with a mains cable, i might as > well run a midi line. and even if i found a fader box with batteries, my > client would then have to maintain two battery-powered devices, possibly > with different standby times - i don't think that's feasible, since the > lab where this gadget is going to be installed will be operated by > users, not techies. so if it's going to be wireless, it has to be fully > integrated. Increase the gadget effect: make it an xPhone app.. and just sent the info via OSC. - There's already various tools for Android, iPhone, iPad etc to map on-screen-sliders to OSC commands. The "cheap" option is to get an iPod-touch instead of a phone, but hey your client may already have some touch-screen phone - maybe even some old ones sitting unused on a shelf.. Sure they're not physical sliders and certainly not motorized, but wireless. YMMV. > if cables can't be avoided, maybe i can find some schematics for a > simple motorfader midi controller and use a simple cat5 for > bi-directional midi and power... suggestions, anyone? > > best, > > > jörn > > _______________________________________________ > Linux-audio-user mailing list > Linux-audio-user@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > http://lists.linuxaudio.org/listinfo/linux-audio-user _______________________________________________ Linux-audio-user mailing list Linux-audio-user@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.linuxaudio.org/listinfo/linux-audio-user
