On Mon, 18 Jul 2011 17:55:34 -0400 Paul Coccoli <pcoccoli@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On Sun, Jul 17, 2011 at 7:25 AM, Dale Powell <dj_kaza@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > Agree on the whole that summing is summing is summing. Most DAWs these days > > will use floating point (either 32bit or double precision) and A+B=C no > > matter what. > > Isn't all this "A+B=C" stuff (or A*x+B*y=C as one person stated) > actually begging the question a bit? Are we certain that every DAW > implements their mixer that way? Isn't it possible that some might > try to model analog mixers to some degree? > > I'm not arguing either way; I have no clue. I think you'll find that fundamentally an analogue mixer *is* A+B=C -- Will J Godfrey http://www.musically.me.uk Say you have a poem and I have a tune. Exchange them and we can both have a poem, a tune, and a song. _______________________________________________ Linux-audio-user mailing list Linux-audio-user@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.linuxaudio.org/listinfo/linux-audio-user
