On Thu, Jun 23, 2011 at 11:30 AM, David Baron <d_baron@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: >> Does anyone uses oomidi 2 and / or can tell us what to expect really > >> when it comes to an stable release or not and if yes, when? > > Gitting it right now! Looks quite exciting. > > My last windows software was Home Studio, Sonar's little cousin with much > more bang for the buck. The Win98 version dispensed with the console > view--no big loss since a mouse is no engineer's 10 fingers. When i-Pad > screens can be used for such programs, this will change. OOM has drawn > automation like Home Studio as well as a console view. Looking forward to > giving this a try. > > Let's get this straight, windows has two big programs, Sonar and Cubase and > some smaller opensource and other competition. Count the linux choices! Windows has more than just two -- you forgot about Pro-Tools, Nuendo, Reason, FLStudio, Reaper, Ableton Live... I believe OOM2 is based on Muse (which has a 2.0 version in beta, BTW), whereas OOM1 was based on Rosegarden with the notation stuff stripped out and a couple of other tweaks. I'd tried using OOM1 and liked it quite a bit but it was terribly unstable so I abandoned it (and it wouldn't build on anything except Gentoo). -- Brett W. McCoy -- http://www.electricminstrel.com ------------------------------------------------------------------------ "In the rhythm of music a secret is hidden; If I were to divulge it, it would overturn the world." -- Jelaleddin Rumi _______________________________________________ Linux-audio-user mailing list Linux-audio-user@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.linuxaudio.org/listinfo/linux-audio-user
