|
On Tuesday 19 Sivan 5771 22:03:08 Ralf Mardorf wrote: > Hi, > > could there be any disadvantages for averaged desktop users, server > usage etc., if the kernel 2.6.39 is build as PREEMPT kernel? > > Today I installed the kernel from the repositories of a major Distro: > > $ uname -a > Linux debian 2.6.39-2-amd64 #1 SMP Wed Jun 8 11:01:04 UTC 2011 x86_64 > GNU/Linux > > Some time ago I build the kernel myself: > > $ uname -a > Linux debian 2.6.39.1 #1 SMP PREEMPT Tue Jun 7 01:40:05 CEST 2011 x86_64 > GNU/Linux > > I'm asking, because I want to know, if it would be reasonable to appeal, > that major distros should build it as PREEMPT kernel. Many have said no. Alternative would be to offer several linux-image's. Regular, PREEMPT, maybe even RT-PREEMPT. They could have version numbers enabling multiple installation so one could try both. |
_______________________________________________ Linux-audio-user mailing list Linux-audio-user@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.linuxaudio.org/listinfo/linux-audio-user
