> To me that suggests that either you have a completely unique > problem to solve or that they are other solutions to your > problem that other people use to get around the same problem. > My guess is that your problem is not completely unique. Certainly not unique. My guess is that nobody worried about a (possibly small) performance penalty, and instead used simpler strategies. Or they gave up libsndfile, or they never used libsndfile in the first place (e.g. due to the scaling factors issue). > Modifying libsndfile to do fread/fwrite style buffering would be > relatively easy. Again, patches accepted. Given the virtual I/O layer in libsndfile, this is superfluous (and, furthermore, a userspace cache adds an extra layer of copying, which in *other* use cases could reduce performance). > Was that a confirmation or a request for confirmation? Joining a > mailing list usually involves: I know. Maybe I messed something up -- I don't have copies anymore. However if that were the case the message I sent two weeks ago should have bounced back too. The main problem that I see though is the lack of a mailing list archive. So let's continue on LAD. -- Dan _______________________________________________ Linux-audio-user mailing list Linux-audio-user@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.linuxaudio.org/listinfo/linux-audio-user
