On Sun, Jun 12, 2011 at 9:40 AM, Aaron Krister Johnson <aaron@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > <snip> > I'm wondering if anyone can comment on this. It seems odd, especially since > the jack developers claim jack adds no latency by itself to the picture in > any situation---so, do we have a situation where the code is better written > for the alsa driver than for jackd? It seems we do, in this case.... > Best, > AKJ JACK adds no latency but it adds a bit more CPU usage. Nothing too much to be noticed on fast CPUs but if you are very limited with resources it is very noticable (on my old EEE704 I can run Pianoteq with alsa and using Rhody patch almost normally but with JACK it won't do. On my Core2Duo I can't even see difference in CPU usage between JACK and alsa). Cheers! Igor _______________________________________________ Linux-audio-user mailing list Linux-audio-user@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.linuxaudio.org/listinfo/linux-audio-user
