Robin Paulson wrote:
On 16 May 2011 03:17, Lorenzo Sutton <lsutton@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
One important point for me was to have jack1 packages not jack2. The
latter wouldn't be picked up by the ./configure script and in turn there
would be no jack.
hmm, that's kind of important for me. is there a jack1 compatibility
wrapper or similar?
Good question. I've noticed for some application that compiling with
jack1 and then running with jack2 works fine. But I guess it's more of a
jack-dev question
can anyone answer this? given that linuxsampler relies on jack1, is it
able to use jack2? is it only a matter of forcing the dependencies? or
does ls need to be changed at the code level?
alternatively, are there any wrappers which allow jack1 applications
to use jack2?
Hmmm, I use JACK2 and haven't met any JACK1 apps that didn't work with
it, but I don't really do a lot of JACK apps if your talking about
things like JACK Rack, etc. And I don't have linuxsampler around. I
thought one of the folk on the list used linuxsampler with JACK for
their live sound?
--
David
gnome@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
authenticity, honesty, community
_______________________________________________
Linux-audio-user mailing list
Linux-audio-user@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.linuxaudio.org/listinfo/linux-audio-user
