On 11.03.2011 20:11, hermann wrote:
Am Freitag, den 11.03.2011, 19:57 +0100 schrieb Dragan Noveski:
On 11.03.2011 19:51, hermann wrote:
Am Freitag, den 11.03.2011, 19:44 +0100 schrieb Dragan Noveski:
On 11.03.2011 18:20, hermann wrote:
For those how like the latest development from the guitarix project, I
will let you know that there are some new amp/tube models available in
our SVN repository. Lately suggested by guitarix friend merlinthegreen
we have reworked the drive function so that a value from zero now realy
is zero (bypassed) to reach clean sounds, all tubes can use now a cubic
non-linear distortion or a simple non-linear drive for the drive knob.
A new tube model (6DJ8) is added.
One more, Pete Shorthose have join the development team and have add
animation support to libgxw and committed animated Knobs and new switch
images for the head.
Those how wone have a first impress of what is going on, check out our
SVN repository. To build the head from SVN you need to add the configure
flag --build_head to ./waf configure.
have fun
hermann
hallo hermann,
thanks for the update.
do you have an idea, what this error is about:
svn co http://guitarix.svn.sourceforge.net/svnroot/guitarix/trunk guitarix
./waf configure --prefix=/usr --includeresampler --includeconvolver
--experimental --optimization --build_head
./waf build
......
[190/268] dsp: src/faust/phaser.dsp -> build/default/src/faust/phaser.cc
[191/268] dsp: src/faust/gxamp.dsp -> build/default/src/faust/gxamp.cc
undefined symbol BoxIdent[count]
????:-1: ERROR: undefined symbol BoxIdent[count]
Waf: Leaving directory `/home/nowhiskey/Desktop/src/guitarix/build'
Build failed: -> task failed (err #1):
{task: dsp gxamp.dsp -> gxamp.cc}
nowhiskey@murija5:~/Desktop/src/guitarix$
cheers,
doc
Yes, you need the latest faust from git or minimal version 0.9.30 to
rebuild the faust modules.
You can avoid that by add --no-faust to the configure line.
Thanks for head up, that means also that I need to update the wscript,
were I have indicate faust version 0.9.24 as minimal, what is definably
wrong.
greats
hermann
ok, will do that ( --no-faust ).
but could you explain what faust is actually doing in guitarix/gx_head,
or what would be the difference between an version build with and
another one build w/out faust?
cheers,
doc
Yea, we wrote all dsp parts in faust language, as modules. The faust
compiler compile it to C++. We pass this source to a python script to
rework the source to our needs. Those rebuild sources are in
the /faust-generated folder. So, you wouldnât experience a difference if
you use faust or not to build guitarix/gx_head because we ship all files
build by faust within the package/repository. Only, when you decide to
have a look at the faust source and wont to modifies it, then you need
to build it with faust to make your modifications work. So, it's more a
option for developers.
greats
hermann
all right, thanks for the clarification!
but than this option should be off by default perhaps?
thanks again and cheers,
doc
_______________________________________________
Linux-audio-user mailing list
Linux-audio-user@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.linuxaudio.org/listinfo/linux-audio-user
