Excerpts from Bearcat M. Sandor's message of 2011-02-09 20:49:07 +0100: > On 2/9/2011 3:05 AM, Philipp Ãberbacher wrote: > > SND seems to be extremely powerful and flexible but its learning curve > > is insane. I just found out that it has a built-in extensive, > > half-working, possibly useful help system. > > > > There's SND-ls that aims to make SND usable by mere mortals, but I'm not > > sure it achieved this goal yet: > > http://archive.notam02.no/arkiv/src/snd-ls/ > I've understood (though not used) ecasound to have a lower learning > curve and be just as able as snd. Is that correct? > > Bearcat M. Sandor It's hard to say because it's hard to compare those two programs. SND is a completely scriptable graphical audio editor. Ecasound is a DAW with a commandline interface and bindings for many programming languages. I'm sure both can be used for pretty similar things but their goals are different and they both have a rather steep learning curve. _______________________________________________ Linux-audio-user mailing list Linux-audio-user@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.linuxaudio.org/listinfo/linux-audio-user
