On 28 January 2011 20:10, <fons@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On Fri, Jan 28, 2011 at 07:27:55AM +0300, Alexandre Prokoudine wrote: > >> Speaking of pretty interfaces, both MusE and OOM2 need a revamp. OOM2 >> is a step in the right direction, but it's still in late 90s (as well >> as way too many other apps). Sadly, there is only one Thorsten Wilms, >> and whoever did Wired is not around anymore. IMO, only Calf from Git >> has state of the art UI today, with Ardour 3 next to it and Rosegarden >> trotting along. > > I'd be interested to know what, in your opinion, makes a GUI 'state > of the art' as opposed 'late 90s'. In other words, a list of features, > properties etc. as opposed to just an example to look at. > > P.S. I'm not trolling. I really want to know. To me, it should be shiny. Like this: http://www.libnui.net/ :P -- GPG/PGP ID: B42DDCAD _______________________________________________ Linux-audio-user mailing list Linux-audio-user@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.linuxaudio.org/listinfo/linux-audio-user
