Re: [LAD] OpenOctaveMidi2 (OOM2) beta release

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 01/28/2011 03:57 AM, Christopher Cherrett wrote:
-------- Original Message  --------
Subject: Re: [LAD] OpenOctaveMidi2 (OOM2) beta release
From: Paul Davis <paul@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
To: alex stone <compose59@xxxxxxxxx>
Cc: LAU Mail List <linux-audio-user@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Linux Audio Developers <Linux-audio-dev@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: 01/27/2011 09:52 AM
On Thu, Jan 27, 2011 at 11:46 AM, alex stone<compose59@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
On Thu, Jan 27, 2011 at 7:08 PM, Paul Davis<paul@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
On Thu, Jan 27, 2011 at 9:39 AM, alex stone<compose59@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
    [ ... ]

good grief!

i never said you were bad people. i have a lot of respect for you and
chris. i was just puzzled and bit bothered that you would fork Muse
and announce OOM2 without anything that notified people of that
relationship. If you had forked *any* existing project of that size,
for *any* purpose, I would have thought it would be common, normal
practice to do make that link so that people (users, developers,
supporters etc.) could make that link too.

apparently, you feel otherwise. that's fine, just a little odd for
most open source projects, that's all.
_______________________________________________
Linux-audio-dev mailing list
Linux-audio-dev@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.linuxaudio.org/listinfo/linux-audio-dev
Possibly you want to choose your words more carefully.

I have worked my but off for the last month. My head is burning from no sleep. My team is worn down from no sleep and it all started with Ardour falling apart in our studios.

As I said there would be no oom2 if not for Ardour coming down around us. Sad I had to say this publicly, however you picked the location.

You have no place to try to do such damage.

So, you spent a whole month on a fork of Muse because of a problem you found in Ardour and you claim it is Ardours fault that you didn't acknowledge the heritage of your new project?

Seems a bit rash to me. 320+ hours of dev time on the problem in Ardour would probably have fixed the issue you claim as a blocker.

New projects are fine and working from existing codebases is definitely the way to go but creating a whole new project because of a limitation you have found in an existing actively developed and maintained project seems like a waste of time and unnecessary fragmentation to me.



--
Patrick Shirkey
Boost Hardware Ltd.

_______________________________________________
Linux-audio-user mailing list
Linux-audio-user@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.linuxaudio.org/listinfo/linux-audio-user


[Index of Archives]     [Linux Sound]     [ALSA Users]     [Pulse Audio]     [ALSA Devel]     [Sox Users]     [Linux Media]     [Kernel]     [Photo Sharing]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Media]

  Powered by Linux