On Thu, Jan 27, 2011 at 2:50 PM, Christopher Cherrett <ccherrett@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > Seems a bit more than a question, seems there is a few insinuations. whatever insinuations are there are entirely your own imagination at work. to repeat: i think (and said) that its (quite deeply) wrong to take an existing FLOSS project, fork it, and not make it clear that was the origin of a "new" project. however, reasonable people can agree to disagree on whether that's really true, and it certainly isn't against any licenses or anything like that. i was more just puzzled why you chose to not refer to Muse when announcing OOM2, and perhaps shaded my question too darkly. as i said previously, i wish OOM2 well, and will look forward to seeing what you guys come up with. _______________________________________________ Linux-audio-user mailing list Linux-audio-user@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.linuxaudio.org/listinfo/linux-audio-user
