Re: LV2, DSSI and the future of plugins

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Dave Phillips wrote:
Alexandre Prokoudine wrote:
On 1/14/11, Jeremy Jongepier wrote:
Don't forget native Linux VST's, their number is steadily growing also.
I think I have about 60 to 70 of those sitting on my harddrive.
Unfortunately there are very few hosts.

The last sentence quite nails it :)


Qtractor's been doing a pretty good job with the native VSTs I've tried in it. What really needs done is a repair/rejuvenation of Lucio Asnaghi's JOST. A working standalone host for native VSTs would be nice.

I recently purchased Loomer's Sequent, it's a lot of fun. I notice they also have a nice-looking synthesizer in their catalog.

The LinuxDSP plugins - in all formats - seem pretty professional to my ears and eyes.

Best,

dp
_______________________________________________
Linux-audio-user mailing list
Linux-audio-user@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.linuxaudio.org/listinfo/linux-audio-user


The plan is that the linuxDSP plugins should all be available in "all" formats eventually - LV2 seems to be by far the most popular, although I suspect that is in no small part due to ardour's support for it. There are not many VST hosts, and I can understand that the steinberg license causes problems for some open-source projects (although, I have been testing the linuxDSP VSTs with builds of qtractor using the vestige headers and everything seems to work, so perhaps that provides a way to drive more support for VST - Rui has done a great job with qtractor, creating a DAW is no small undertaking!) As regards the perceived lack of plugins - I think actually there are a wealth of capable plugins available, but as with any OS there are some good and some bad, (think of the number of questionable synthedit generated free VSTs on windows..) - from a (commercial) developer point of view, I would add that developing reliable and useful (and perhaps professional quality) plugins requires a lot of specialist knowledge, and is a very significant amount of work. Often the commercial returns are quite small - our most significant revenue last year came not from downloads of linux plugins but from porting DSP technology to other commercial products, and I suspect this is true for developers on other OS too. Some of which might explain the reluctance of commercial developers to support development for linux.

_______________________________________________
Linux-audio-user mailing list
Linux-audio-user@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.linuxaudio.org/listinfo/linux-audio-user


[Index of Archives]     [Linux Sound]     [ALSA Users]     [Pulse Audio]     [ALSA Devel]     [Sox Users]     [Linux Media]     [Kernel]     [Photo Sharing]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Media]

  Powered by Linux