On Thu, Dec 30, 2010 at 6:48 AM, drew Roberts <zotz@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On Wednesday 29 December 2010 16:31:03 Andrew C wrote: >> Last time I checked, LS is Open Source, > > Are you saying it meets this: > > http://www.opensource.org/osd.html > > Do you think it also meets this: > > http://www.gnu.org/philosophy/free-sw.html > > all the best, > > drew IMO it meets neither in that redistribution is limited by the changes in the license which made it non-GPL. The 'source' is 'open' in the sense that we can get copies, look at the code & modify it and use it. Unfortunately we are restricted (granted, restricted in ways that likely don't matter much to individual musicians) in our _use_ of the code via redistribution into commercial platforms. - Mark _______________________________________________ Linux-audio-user mailing list Linux-audio-user@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.linuxaudio.org/listinfo/linux-audio-user
