Re: Ardour3

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Fabio wrote:
Em terça-feira 21 dezembro 2010, às 12:17:24, Dave Phillips escreveu:
Some distro maintainers obviously feel that this means they can ignore his wishes if they so please

Did you read the messages?

Every one, from your first post to the latest. I understand them, too.

 AUR-scripts are usermade.

And it makes no difference to the point. In effect the users become package maintainers, and they are still acting opposite to the *request* made by the developer.

To me, the issue is one of civility. It's not like Paul's thoughts on the matter are unclear. At any time the script writer(s) could have directly asked Paul whether he could be supportive of the script. Perhaps then they could have worked out an acceptable scheme to preclude this kind of thread. Perhaps they would have been dissatisified with his response and proceeded to do as they did anyway, but at least there would have been some dialog. As it is, he finds out about this stuff by surprise, and then we have this thread.

I build A3 daily from SVN sources. If I have a question or lament about it I go to IRC, not here and not on the Ardour forums. That is what the developer has asked testers to do and I feel I should honor his request. Yes, I'm certainly free to do otherwise, but I understand why Paul makes the request and I respect it.

Best,

dp

_______________________________________________
Linux-audio-user mailing list
Linux-audio-user@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.linuxaudio.org/listinfo/linux-audio-user



[Index of Archives]     [Linux Sound]     [ALSA Users]     [Pulse Audio]     [ALSA Devel]     [Sox Users]     [Linux Media]     [Kernel]     [Photo Sharing]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Media]

  Powered by Linux