Em segunda-feira 20 dezembro 2010, às 16:39:45, Dieter Plaetinck escreveu: > On Mon, 20 Dec 2010 13:26:31 -0500 > Paul Davis <paul@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > On Mon, Dec 20, 2010 at 1:20 PM, Fabio <capoeirista@xxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > > > ok, i was just asking, since the maintainer there comented it. > > > > > > no need to get angry, we are just curious..lol > > > > i'm angry because i've said all the way through ardour3 development > > that packaging of any kind doesn't make any sense. i'm upset that > > someone would give users a 2nd-rate experience by making them think > > that they had received an "important" version of ardour3 rather than > > just another svn commit that will be out of date in a few hours. > > _______________________________________________ > > Linux-audio-user mailing list > > Linux-audio-user@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > > http://lists.linuxaudio.org/listinfo/linux-audio-user > > the ardour3-svn pgkbuild in AUR is basically nothing more then a simple > script which saves users who want to run from svn some typing work. > this is not an official package or whatever. > users who use this know that it is not supported by Arch and obviously, > that it builds from svn. what should probably be added is a clear > disclaimer "do not ask upstream for support on this unless you know how > to debug" or something like that. > Removing the pkgbuild (and hence just making it harder to run from svn) > doesn't solve the core problem. a warning like the one above does. > > Dieter > _______________________________________________ > Linux-audio-user mailing list > Linux-audio-user@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > http://lists.linuxaudio.org/listinfo/linux-audio-user > true _______________________________________________ Linux-audio-user mailing list Linux-audio-user@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.linuxaudio.org/listinfo/linux-audio-user
