On Wed, Dec 15, 2010 at 02:09:49PM +0100, rosea.grammostola wrote: > On 12/15/2010 12:56 PM, rosea.grammostola wrote: > >On 12/15/2010 05:33 AM, Ronan Jouchet wrote: > >>On 10-12-14 02:38 PM, ailo wrote: > >>>On 12/14/2010 08:06 PM, Alessio Igor Bogani wrote: > >>>>The -lowlatency 2.6.37-8.21~ppa1 kernel have RT_GROUP_SCHED enabled. > >>>>Instead the 2.6.37-9.22~ppa1 one's have RT_GROUP_SCHED disabled. > >>>> > >>>>Anyone could test those? > >>>> > >>>>Ciao, > >>>>Alessio > >>>> > >>> > >>>On Natty, 2.6.37-9.22~ppa1, Virtualbox > >>> > >>>... > >> > >>I confirm 2.6.37-9.22~ppa1 from abogani PPA (RT_GROUP_SCHED > >>disabled) works fine. > > > >AFAIK the *.33 kernel from abogani, CONFIG_RT_GROUP_SCHED=y, works > >fine (using audio.conf instead of limits.conf). > > > >(All though I have an issue with installing a package like > >libboost-dev, which takes minuts when booted a RT kernel and > >seconds when using the generic kernel, Ubuntu and Debian, kernel > >2.6.33.7-rt2. The Debian RT kernel has RT_GROUP_SCHED disabled > >though..., > > > >http://www.spinics.net/lists/linux-audio-users/msg74100.html ) > > > >\r > BTW the kernel for Tango Studio has it also enable afaik > > grep -i RT_GROUP_SCHED /boot/config-2.6.32-25-lowlatency > CONFIG_RT_GROUP_SCHED=y > > Lucid here. Does this whole story apply to Ubuntu 10.04 also? as long as no cgroups are used, this is not a problem. but when processes get moved outside of the root cgroup, its very unlikely, that these cgroups have rt bandwidth assigned to them > > \r > _______________________________________________ > Linux-audio-user mailing list > Linux-audio-user@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > http://lists.linuxaudio.org/listinfo/linux-audio-user -- torben Hohn _______________________________________________ Linux-audio-user mailing list Linux-audio-user@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.linuxaudio.org/listinfo/linux-audio-user
