Re: 200 lines kernel patch

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Sat, Nov 20, 2010 at 4:48 AM, Atte André Jensen <atte@xxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Hi
>
> Aparently a new, 200 lines kernel patch have been buzzing the web lately,
> supposedly it should provide a much more responsive desktop.
>
> But this userspace alternative should be even better:
> http://www.webupd8.org/2010/11/alternative-to-200-lines-kernel-patch.html
>
> Anyone heard of it, tried it and/or has any thoughts whether it has anything
> to offer on a DAW?

it doesn't look terribly relevant because a DAW is going to schedule
most threads that matter with SCHED_FIFO. these threads will be
scheduled by a different set of rules than SCHED_OTHER (i.e. most of
the desktop threads, and the scheduling class that is affected by the
patch). that's not to say it might not still make things feel a bit
better, but it won't really make lower latencies possible etc. etc.. I
think.
_______________________________________________
Linux-audio-user mailing list
Linux-audio-user@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.linuxaudio.org/listinfo/linux-audio-user



[Index of Archives]     [Linux Sound]     [ALSA Users]     [Pulse Audio]     [ALSA Devel]     [Sox Users]     [Linux Media]     [Kernel]     [Photo Sharing]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Media]

  Powered by Linux