Re: edirol fa101 on differant rate that 48k ?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Thu, 18 Nov 2010 21:37:30 +0100
fons@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx wrote:

> On Thu, Nov 18, 2010 at 06:29:02AM -0500, Paul Davis wrote:
> 
> > there has never been, to my knowledge, any double blind test that
> > has revealed that any more than a tiny number of individuals (if
> > even that) can hear the difference between the 4X kHz SR range
> > (44.1, 48 etc) and the 8X+ kHz SR range (88.2 and above).
> 
> transcoded to CD standards (44.1 kHz, 16 bit). Two results 
> emerged from this:
> 
> 1. Nobody could hear any difference between the original recordings,
> reproduced using the best equipment available, and the transcoded
> versions. 
> 
> 2. Almost all listeners preferred the 'audiophile' recordings to
> other versions of the same music released on CD. 

I don't understand how the second question could even posed in relation
to the first.

If there is no difference, there can be no preference, unless, of
course, they had other factors to consider besides music.

David
_______________________________________________
Linux-audio-user mailing list
Linux-audio-user@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.linuxaudio.org/listinfo/linux-audio-user


[Index of Archives]     [Linux Sound]     [ALSA Users]     [Pulse Audio]     [ALSA Devel]     [Sox Users]     [Linux Media]     [Kernel]     [Photo Sharing]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Media]

  Powered by Linux