On Tue, Oct 19, 2010 at 01:25:23PM +0200, Julien Claassen wrote: > Hello everyone! > I was wondering about this. In Nama it is allowed to connect > multiple jack_ports to one ecasound port. So I can connect a pack of > hydrogen ports to one ecasound port. So I don't have to record > 30-odd tracks for one drumkit. But the connection takes very long. > Would it be possible to move all the connects in the background and > let them finish their jobs there. > The number of ports I'm connecting is around 60-66, so 30-33 > pairs. Or is there another way (with external utilities or a Perl > module, to accelerate this process? Nama could easily be modified to start 60-or-so parallel jack_connect processes in the background, however I'm curious: is there any special reason why jack_connect should take a long time to return? Would parallel jack_connect processes be competing for resources in some way? It might be informative to start Ecasound in the --server mode with the -ddd (debugging) flag, and look for any signs of bottleneck on that end. Since JACK has an "industrial strength" design, I would be surprised if the JACK server's implementation turned out to be a limiting factor. jack_connect, on the other hand, might suffer from some sub-optimal behavior. It would be great if we could track down the reason for this slow response connecting Ecasound ports to Hydrogen. Joel > Kindest regards > Julien -- Joel Roth _______________________________________________ Linux-audio-user mailing list Linux-audio-user@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.linuxaudio.org/listinfo/linux-audio-user