Re: RF64 file format and commercial software

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 10/14/10 06:56, Erik de Castro Lopo wrote:
> fons@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx wrote:
>> I'm not really in love with RF64. For my own multichannel use I've
>> standardized on CAF - clean format, no 4GB problems, and all apps
>> using your library can read it.
> Thats an interesting choice.

It's a logical choice given the fact that there are not too many proper
formats for big blobs. I came to the same conclusion a few years ago and
used it ever since.

Funny that some of Apple's own programs didn't seem to support CAF with
all it's features. I remember one time giving a ~70GB recording to an
external studio for mixing and Logic couldn't open a 32 tracks float
format CAF. Luckily they had Audacity installed and extracted all tracks
manually - which took them 2h of paid studio time.. ..a bill I would
really like to send to Apple.


Flo
-- 
Machines can do the work, so people have time to think.
public key DA43FEF4          x-hkp://wwwkeys.eu.pgp.net
_______________________________________________
Linux-audio-user mailing list
Linux-audio-user@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.linuxaudio.org/listinfo/linux-audio-user


[Index of Archives]     [Linux Sound]     [ALSA Users]     [Pulse Audio]     [ALSA Devel]     [Sox Users]     [Linux Media]     [Kernel]     [Photo Sharing]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Media]

  Powered by Linux